The real estate drama unfolding at 18 rue Bernard in Marseille illustrates the endless struggle of two co-owners confronted with a disastrous situation. Since 2013, these residents have faced a succession of incompetent property managers and construction defects, jeopardizing the viability of their building. Over the years, the situation has deteriorated, reflecting a neglect by the managers that has worsened the nuisances and insecurity within this condominium.
The beginnings of a real estate deadlock
18 rue Bernard, located in the Belle de Mai neighborhood of Marseille, was assigned the status of simple peril in 2013. This building, consisting of 12 lots, has become the witness of a true saga of disastrous management. In ten years, no fewer than six property managers have come and gone, leaving behind a dismal record and unresolved structural problems. Which property manager would still take the risk to intervene in a troubled, unprofitable, and time-consuming building?
Chains of property managers and implicit accomplices
The property managers who have handled this condominium all share a common trait: deplorable management. Between the ongoing proceedings with Auriol and the interventions from agencies like Citya and Siga, it is evident that communication and competence were lacking. The co-owners, already at their wit’s end, are forced to fight in a system where very few seem to care about the state of their building.
The consequences of negligence
With the inaction of the property managers, the building has undergone alarming construction defects. The work that began in 2017 was jeopardized by the bankruptcy of a design office, leaving the co-owners in a state of chaos. The work, far from resolving the issues, has only made them worse: defective stairs, walls knocked down without precautions, and a total lack of compliance with construction standards. Over 40,000 euros invested for absent results are symptomatic of catastrophic management.
Co-owners exhausted by the struggle
Events continue to worsen with water leaks, fires, and other damages caused by a lack of maintenance. As their situation deteriorates, the two involved co-owners are at their breaking point. Despite the intervention of lawyers and several formal notices, their building is now at the mercy of the whims of successive property managers.
An uncertain future for the condominium
Ten years after the first declaration of peril, the town hall has once again reviewed the situation, issuing an even more severe safety ruling. What will become of this emblematic building that shares so many similarities with other tragic cases in Marseille, such as the one on rue d’Aubagne? The consequences are visible and undeniable. Only determined actions can restore a situation that sometimes seems hopeless.
The case of the building on rue Bernard in Marseille is a true revealer of the dysfunctions within property management. The negligent managers who have allowed the situation to worsen testify to a systemic failure affecting many condominiums throughout the city. With poorly executed work, a lack of follow-up, and a total absence of accountability, the future of this building appears uncertain. The co-owners, exhausted by this relentless struggle, are in search of a solution, but it still seems out of reach. In this context, the question of the management of *property managers* and their role in maintaining the safety and hygiene of buildings becomes paramount. A call for reform and increased responsibility is essential within the framework of the operation of property managers in France. With life and death stakes involved, it is time to address this problem constructively. The situation inevitably calls for a profound reconsideration of the values and functioning of condominium living in our society.
